Skip to content

Our Church Building Isn’t a Cathedral But We Love It Anyway

January 3, 2012

For the congregation of St Columba’s Church, 2012 will be a year of many things, no doubt, both ups and downs, and then ups again. Were I to attempt to identify these on behalf of the congregation, it would only be pure guesswork. I have received no revelation of events to come; no dreams, no insights, and I have no idea what lies ahead as the year unfolds if the Lord does not return imminently.

But there is one thing I can predict, with confidence and certainty, though with no great excitement or sense of eager expectation, and it is that we, the congregation of St Columba’s, will spend much of the year regularly moving the church sanctuary chairs back and forth, as we do each week of each year, just as we have done ever since the church opened in 1983.

Some of us are veteran chair-moving technicians. We have been moving the chairs around for all of those years, right from the beginning, down from the stage onto the sanctuary floor, and back up onto the stage once again, and then in the midweek, perhaps, if we are fortunate, moving them in fewer numbers, for smaller gatherings and occasions.

It is a feature of our church building and premises that it is a multi-purpose place, flexible in all sorts of ways, permitting it to be used for a variety of purposes, some seemingly more mundane than others. The big effort always is, of course, the arrangement of chairs for Sunday services, morning and evening.

My own OCD is apparent in the tidiness of the rows, the symmetrical layout of rows and columns, at least for the morning service. I can frequently be found walking up and down the rows making slight adjustments here and there, with military precision, aligning and correcting. The evening service is a different matter, with chairs and tables laid out in the current vogue for ‘café style’ worship, which slightly worries me occasionally when I reflect on the worship tightrope upon which we traverse between relaxedness and reverence.

But back to the morning chair layout, if you are still with me by this stage – there is a serious point coming, I promise.

Chair layout is purely functional. It is not always the purpose of ‘church’ that defines the ways in which the chairs are placed, but the size and geography of the building. I know, it’s the wrong way to do things, isn’t it? But that is our reality, in any case. Our ‘worship space’ is a large square with a table and lectern at the south end. We sit looking at the back of the head of the person in front of each of us because that is the best way to fit as many seats into the floor space as we possibly can.

It militates against fellowship. That is true. It reinforces separation. It teaches individualism. It silently speaks about independency when the central message of the church is all about Jesus, who brings us into a body, into connectedness, unity, and mutual love. There’s not much we can do about that, which is why we try, at least in part, to overcome the negative messages of our church building by sitting around tables for Sunday evening worship, facing one another and eating biscuits, drinking tea whilst we sing and discuss.

But I have come to see that our church building has some more positive lessons to teach us, as well, which were never a carefully thought-out design feature, but which are nevertheless valuable and true.

You see, although we are apt to complain that our building is aesthetically unattractive and plain, its very adaptability and ordinariness serve to remind us that true worship is not about meeting in grand and imposing premises, no matter how hard the gong is banged about the importance of ‘sacred space.’ For wherever the Spirit of God is, that is sacred space, and no building, pathway, ruin or island is more sacred than any other place on earth. We have known times of the most exquisite spiritual blessing in our humble building, and I cannot think that those times could ever have been more precious had they take place in a cathedral or an abbey, however ancient.

I think, too, that our pre-fabricated church building, ordinary as it is, though wonderfully decorated each Sunday by our superb flower arranging team, silently tells us that God is to be found in the ordinary places and circumstances of life. Not for Him the grandeur of lofty architecture, though I don’t discount the possibility of having one’s thoughts turned heavenwards by fluted columns and vaunted ceilings. Nevertheless, many of us have met and served God whilst rolling out the indoor bowling mat, or when scraping the playgroup’s playdough off the sanctuary carpet, or in process of struggling to get the temperamental heaters to work at the correct temperature.

What I am saying is this: our church building is not Notre Dame Cathedral, nor is it filled with beautiful woodwork and stained glass. Instead, it is a large and plain room, with a kitchen, classroom and toilet. It is off-the-shelf. But it has taught us many important things. It has taught us that the church is not the building, it is the people. If we had found our spiritual home in a wonderful edifice, we might have found that a difficult lesson to learn. But we have learned to love each other, for the church is a family united around the central character of our beloved Lord, Jesus.

I think, too, that our multi-purpose ‘facility’ has fostered and nurtured those connections and relationships through practical issues. We have had to roll our sleeves up together and work alongside one another to shift chairs, week in and week out, year in and year out. We have laughed as we did so, and moaned a little, too, usually wondering how blessed it would be to have pews! We have shown concern and Christian love for each other by telling one or two of the older saints, keen to pitch in, to have a well-earned rest and to take it easy; their chair-moving days having come to an end.

We have realised that God and His kingdom are in everyday, ordinary people, things and experiences. God is not confined or especially present in so-called special places. We believe that this is a major gospel insight.

We’re grateful for our church building, and we will value the lessons of the kingdom that it teaches us, and we will try to complain about it just a little bit less.

Soli Deo Gloria

Advertisement
7 Comments leave one →
  1. January 6, 2012 11:47 am

    Enjoyable post. I do think we are becoming far too enamoured by aesthetics. In essence this is Judaistic. Faith, in the NT, is radically in the invisible.

  2. Pamela Watt permalink
    January 22, 2012 9:54 pm

    I especially like ‘God and His Kingdom are in everyday, ordinary people, things and experiences.’ At times He seems far off and distant and sometimes we may look for the big, miraculous experiences. Yet, God is present in His people and wherever they are then we can experience His love and goodness. Putting chairs away with people = putting chairs away with God! There are a few people I’ve met recently whose love and kindness have helped me know that God is real. My family at St C’s help me to know He is real.

  3. Ewan Wilson permalink
    January 27, 2012 12:02 am

    Belonging as I do to a small congregation with a relatively very small Kirk building which went up in 1910, I largely am in wholehearted agreement with you.
    The Psalmist says, does he not, that even the very dust and stones of Zion are precious! ( Ps.102) And, yes, we must beware an undue focus on ‘aesthetics’. However, I do think there is such a thing as a proper Reformed appreciation for Beauty that our meeting places for worship above all should reflect. The very history they embody as testaments to faithful generations of believers and God’s own Covenant faithfulness means that a slap dash, careless dismissing of our worship enviroment as of no account cannot be right. The visible and the material DO matter as very important aspects of the Creation. The Resurrection itself indicates this.
    But there is beauty in plainess! Anyone who does not think so should visit the likes of historic Keach’s Meeting House in Winslow. I confess I like pews but realise there’s no absolute requirement for such traditions. Our own congregation sadly has been without a church hall for a number of years and we have had to remove and store some of our fixed pews in order to accommodate our weekday activities but the church still retains its mute witness to the solemn but homely and sweet nature of communal worship. I very much doubt there can be any virtue in a deliberately ugly or ill attended church. As thoroughly Reformed I firmly believe God is a God of beauty- restrained, calm, contemplative, conducive to spiritual edification and mutual Christian love and care.

  4. Ewan Wilson permalink
    January 27, 2012 12:09 am

    I should have added of course that if ecclesiastical integrity meant we had to leave the building behind then we should most certainly have to do so. No building can have prior claim! #
    It is also absolutely true that too many ‘Protestants’, maybe even especially evangelical ones, have a very inadequate , far too ‘low’ view of the Church as an institution and divinely ordained means of God’s grace and discipline. Splits can only be justified in the most extreme cases and we virtually should have to be ejected for refusing fellowship with and zero tolerance of heresy or gross, flaunting immorality. Sadly I think the Church of Scotland has now reached that nadir.

  5. Mark permalink
    February 1, 2012 8:50 pm

    1 word

    CHAIIIIIRRRS

    btl – and lots of love

    • February 1, 2012 9:56 pm

      Still have to say it, or else the hardy few are left to move them!

  6. GA Wright permalink
    February 6, 2012 3:10 pm

    Whats all this talk of “Cathedrals” in Presbyterian circles?

    Suely you guys mean “High Kirks”?

    Presbterians don’t have or even like Cathedrals (officially anyway): that’s why you burned them all down, in an orgy of destruction worthy of the Taliban, remember?

    How quick we forget!

    Oh that Scotland had even a fraction of the architectural and artistic heritage that was lost forever, during the utter folly of the reformation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 166 other followers